pretty much everything except what I wrote in the cons.Ĭons: Maybe to be picky kept at high ISO above 3200 with bad light, but you already know given the density of the sensor and of course weight of each individual RAW file, about 120 mb or about 60 mb with raw compressed. Pros: Autofocus, responsiveness, ergonomics, key position, file quality and recovery, battery, viewfinder quality, etc. Machine of the highest quality, approved for landscape use and beyond. That said, I was undecided whether to switch to this or to the RV, however for the kind of photos I do I considered it unnecessary to have the AI on the autofocus, the only thing that really seems stupid to me that the RIV does not have is the closure of the curtain during optical replacement. The same sensor is maintained in the A7RV where the quality is the same as this. After all, this Sony sensor (IMX455AQK) is currently in use on other machines in the same category, such as the 61mpx Sigma FP, while rumors say that it may have been selected for the future Leica. The quality between this and the previous one, both as precision of pixels and as dynamic range, I was able to appreciate it for real by comparing my shots of a month ago with those of now. The sensor instead no, that has really changed, it is much more resolute, 19mpx more, but not only. It sounds like but now pressing them is easier even with snow gloves. Everything else is really very similar to the previous one, and the remaining differences are mostly goodies, such as the buttons that have been enlarged. Considerations: What really changes between the R3 and R4 is the quality of the sensor and its resolution. To keep 300dpi in print, with 61mpx I can now reach even 80-90cm long side. I take landscape photos in 99% of cases and print so many in sizes equal to or greater than 60cm long side. Then I switched to this model with the idea of increasing the resolution to be able to make larger prints. Opinion: Before I had the A7R3 which I really liked. For some, the fact that the screen is not as articulated as the most recent, but frankly it does not bother me. Absence of shutter closure when the machine is off to change lenses without the sensor remaining exposed. Many say that the battery does not last long, in truth it seems to me superimposable to the duration of the R3 that I had until recently, and it seems to me an acceptable duration. "Chubby" buttons.Ĭons: Needless to say, the files weigh up to 120-130MB in uncompressed RAW, however it cannot be a "cons" of this machine, at most a con of this category of big-MegaPixel. Improved tropicalization, there are more gaskets than the previous one. Now you can recover both lights and shadows, more tolerable recovery shadows than lights. Better dynamic range than the A7R3 (which was great anyway). Truly precise and sharp pixels, spectacular sensor as color rendering and extreme precision. Pros: Tolerable noise even above 3000 ISO. Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto ( info) Partial, it requires computer software to merge the photos (241 megapixel) Sony E (click here to view all compatible lenses) Sony A7r IV, acquista usato garantito su RCE Fotoįullframe, 36 x 24 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.0x in comparison with FF)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |